
The Head Boom 2026 is here, the lavender prototypes Coco Gauff was hitting at the United Cup are now in retail boxes, and the early playtest verdicts have landed. The headline question going into release was simple: would Hy-Bor, the aerospace-grade material that quietly transformed Head’s 2026 Speed line, do the same for the Boom?
The answer, based on testing from Tennis Warehouse, Tennisnerd, Sportega and others, is more nuanced than a yes or no. The 2026 Boom is genuinely better than its predecessor in feel, response and connection to the ball. The frame is more lively, the contact more informative, and the dwell time noticeably longer. But the stability question that has shadowed this range, especially in the standard MP, has been improved rather than solved. Lighter Boom owners hitting against heavier balls will still feel the frame get pushed around at times.
That nuance is worth keeping in mind because the marketing around this release has been bold. Here’s what the Boom 2026 actually delivers, model by model, and where it sits against the competition.
What’s New for 2026
Hy-Bor in the Shaft
Hy-Bor is a compression-resistant boron fibre material borrowed from aerospace, placed in the shaft to improve perceived stability and impact feel without adding stiffness in a harsh way. Tennis Warehouse described the change as the addition that “really made a positive difference in the feel” of the Boom MP, and Sportega’s reviewers said the new generation has a sharper response, returns information to the hand better, and feels more stable than the outgoing model.
The honest framing on stability: feel is clearly improved. Outright stability against pace, particularly at net and against bigger servers, is incrementally better but not transformed. If you owned a 2024 Boom MP and felt it got pushed around, the 2026 will feel better, but it won’t suddenly behave like a 305g player’s frame. Hy-Bor is now also used in the Head Speed Tour and Head Speed Pro for 2026, where the same principle applies.
AI String Pattern
Head’s first machine-learning-derived string pattern appears on the MP-spec models. The pattern was developed using thousands of simulations alongside player feedback to optimise spin and power without losing court control. In practice, reviewers have called out easy depth, accessible topspin and a lively response from the string bed.
Worth flagging honestly: while several retailer sources lump the entire Boom range under the AI Pattern banner, Head’s marketing materials are clearer about its presence on the MP line. Whether the Pro carries a fully optimised AI pattern or a more traditional layout is something I’ll update once I’ve handled both side by side.
Dual Cosmetics Across the Range
Every Boom model is offered in two colourways: a vibrant blue inspired by Head’s ski racing heritage, and a tonal lavender Alternate collection reflecting Gauff’s preference. The Alternate models include a Hydrosorb Pro Purple grip. Specs and performance are identical across the two cosmetics, so this is purely a visual choice.
A Larger Lineup
The 2026 Boom range is broader than its predecessor. The MP and Pro continue, the MP L returns, and Head has added an MP UL (ultra-lightweight), a Team with a 107 sq in head, and a Junior. There’s also a Boom Elite positioned as the most arm-friendly, recreational-focused option in the range, though availability varies by market.
Confirmed Specifications
| Specification | Boom MP | Boom Pro | Boom MP L | Boom MP UL | Boom Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head size | 100 sq in | 98 sq in | 100 sq in | 100 sq in | 107 sq in |
| Unstrung weight | 295g | 310g | 275g | 255g | 260g |
| String pattern | 16×19 | 16×19 | 16×19 | 16×19 | 16×19 |
| Beam width | 24mm | 22mm | 24mm | 24mm | 26mm |
| Length | 27 inches | 27 inches | 27 inches | 27 inches | 27.4 inches |
| Balance (strung) | 6 pts HL | More HL | More HL | More HL | 0.3 in HL |
The MP keeps its 295g unstrung weight, 100 sq in head, sub-320 swingweight and 6 points head light strung balance, confirmed by Tennis Warehouse’s playtest. The Pro retains the 98 sq in / 310g profile that defines it as the most controlled frame in the range. The Team’s 107 sq in oversize head and extended 27.4 inch length make it the most forgiving option.
Key Technologies
Hy-Bor. New for 2026. Aerospace-grade material in the shaft, designed to add compressional strength and improve impact feel without adding harsh stiffness.
Auxetic 2.0. Returning. Positioned in the yoke and handle, this material expands rather than contracts under load, providing improved feedback and a more forgiving response across the string bed.
Graphene Inside. Returning. Reinforces the frame at key stress points to optimise energy transfer and structural integrity.
Morph Beam. Returning. The frame combines an elongated box beam shaft with a wider, more powerful upper hoop. This is what gives the Boom its distinctive squared-off head shape and dual feel of control through the lower frame and power up top.
AI Pattern (MP-line). New for 2026. Machine-learning-optimised grommet placement and string spacing, intended to maximise spin and power while maintaining shot-shaping ability.
Power Grommets. Enlarged for 2026 to allow more string movement and a slightly larger sweet spot.
Directional Drilling. Refined to improve touch on delicate shots while maintaining the easy power the Boom is known for.
How Each Model Plays
Boom MP
The flagship and the racket most reviewers have spent the most time with. Tennis Warehouse’s playtest summary is a useful anchor: improved feel, fantastic whippability, easy depth and spin, but with reservations. Their testers consistently noted the MP can feel slightly underpowered against frames of similar specs and can get pushed around against heavy incoming pace, particularly at the net.
The 295g unstrung weight is the limiting factor here, not Hy-Bor. The new technology genuinely improves the impact feel, but no shaft material can compensate for a comparatively low static weight when you’re being pulled into a defensive return against a 200kph serve.
Best suited to intermediate to advanced club players who generate their own pace and want a fast-swinging, comfortable, spin-friendly frame. If you’re a counterpuncher who lives off opponents’ pace, you may want to demo before committing. The MP sits firmly in our best power rackets and best spin rackets territory.
Boom Pro
The most controlled frame in the range. The 98 sq in head and 310g unstrung weight give it the stability that’s harder to find in the MP. Tennisnerd called the 2026 Boom Pro a case of controlled power getting smarter and slightly firmer, noting the new layup adds welcome structure without removing the plush Head feel.
Suited to advanced and tournament players with full swings who want the Boom’s signature easy depth alongside genuine control and stability. If you want a powerful frame that doesn’t punish you on heavy returns, the Pro is the more sensible Boom choice for league or tournament play. For more options at this level, see our best advanced tennis rackets guide.
Boom MP L
Same 100 sq in head and core technology package as the standard MP, but lighter at 275g unstrung. This is the one I’d flag for intermediates building their game or anyone moving up from a 250-260g entry-level frame. You get the modern Boom characteristics without committing to a 295g racket that needs proper preparation on every shot. For more options at this level, see our intermediate tennis rackets guide.
Boom MP UL
The new ultra-lightweight option at 255g unstrung. The most accessible Boom yet, designed for beginners and developing players who need the frame to do the work. It carries the same core technology as the MP, just in a much lighter package. If you’re starting out or returning to the game after a long break, this is the most beginner-friendly Boom in the range. Worth comparing against the picks in our tennis rackets for beginners guide.
Boom Team
107 sq in head, 260g unstrung weight, extended 27.4 inch length and a 26mm beam. This is the most forgiving and oversized option in the range. The bigger hitting area and lighter weight make it genuinely arm-friendly for beginners and developing players, but the trade-off is that it sits well outside the typical performance racket category. Choose the Team if you want maximum forgiveness and easy power; choose the MP UL if you want a more traditional 100 sq in feel in a light package.
How the 2026 Compares to the 2024
The mould is unchanged. Core specs are unchanged. The improvements are all driven by Hy-Bor in the shaft, the AI string pattern on the MP-line models, enlarged Power Grommets and refined Directional Drilling.
What’s measurably different on court:
- Better feel and ball connection through impact, with longer dwell time
- A more lively response from the string bed
- Slightly better stability, though limited by the still-light 295g MP weight
- A subtly firmer overall layup, particularly noticeable in the Pro
What hasn’t changed:
- The fundamental Boom DNA of easy power with comfortable feel
- The squared-off head shape and Morph Beam construction
- The sub-320 swingweight territory the MP-line operates in
For 2024 Boom owners, the upgrade case depends on what bothered you. If you loved the easy power but wished for a more informative, connected impact, the 2026 is a clear improvement. If your main frustration was raw stability against heavy hitters, you’ll find the Pro a more meaningful upgrade than the MP.
The Competition
Babolat Pure Drive. Still the category benchmark for power. Stiffer and more overtly powerful than any Boom, less comfortable on the arm. The 2026 Boom MP doesn’t close the raw power gap, but offers a much more arm-friendly experience.
Babolat Pure Aero 100 2026. A more direct competitor on spin than power. The Boom MP feels softer and more dwell-heavy; the Pure Aero feels crisper and more spin-aggressive. If you’re weighing 98 sq in spin frames, our VCORE 98 vs Pure Aero 98 comparison is also worth reading.
Yonex VCORE 2026. Tennis Warehouse positioned the Boom MP as falling between the VCORE 100 and VCORE 100L in terms of weight and feel. The VCORE leans more into spin DNA, while the Boom is more balanced power and comfort.
Yonex Ezone 100. Closest comparison in spirit. Both are intermediate-to-advanced friendly, both prioritise comfort, both have isometric-inspired head shapes. The Ezone is plusher and more controlled; the Boom is livelier and more power-oriented.
Head Speed MP 2026. Within Head’s own range, the Speed MP is the all-rounder, the Boom is the power option. Both now feature Hy-Bor, so the difference is now genuinely about playing philosophy. Choose the Speed if you want versatility and a more classic feel. Choose the Boom if you want easier access to depth and pace.
Tecnifibre Fire 300. Reviewers compared the Boom MP unfavourably to Tecnifibre’s player-frame options in terms of pure feel and control, but favourably in terms of power and forgiveness. If precision is your priority, look at the Fire range or elsewhere in the Head racket category.
String Recommendations
The released frame characteristics confirm what made sense from the preview. The Boom rewards setups that complement its power-comfort profile rather than fighting against it. For more on string types, see our complete guide to tennis strings.
For spin and control with a polyester, Solinco Hyper-G Soft or Head Lynx Tour at 49 to 53 lbs gives you bite without making the frame harsh. The Boom can take a slightly tighter tension than its sub-320 swingweight might suggest because the new layup adds a touch of stiffness.
For comfort-first setups, Tecnifibre NRG2 or Wilson NXT in the 53 to 55 lbs range maximises the Boom’s arm-friendly characteristics and lengthens dwell time further.
For a balanced hybrid, Head Lynx Tour in the mains at 50 lbs with a softer multifilament cross at 52 lbs is a sensible starting point. This setup works particularly well in the MP and Pro.
Complete Your Setup
A serious frame deserves the right supporting kit:
- For protection and transport, see our best tennis bags guide.
- For court-specific footwear, our best tennis shoes guide covers options across surfaces, with deeper dives into hard court shoes and clay court shoes.
- For balls suited to your courts, our best tennis balls guide helps you match the right ball to the right surface.
- For grooving the consistent strokes that get the most out of a power frame, a tennis ball machine is the fastest route to development.
- For grip choice, particularly relevant if you go for the Alternate cosmetic with its Hydrosorb Pro Purple grip, see our best tennis grips guide.
The Verdict
The Head Boom 2026 is a genuinely improved racket, but not a category-defining one. Hy-Bor adds the better feel, longer dwell and more informative impact response that Boom owners have wanted, and the AI string pattern delivers easy depth and spin without making the frame feel loose. The expanded lineup makes the Boom more accessible than ever.
What it doesn’t do is close the gap to the Pure Drive on raw power, or fully solve the stability question in the lighter MP. The Pro is the most complete frame in the range and arguably the model that benefits most from the 2026 update. The MP is better than the 2024 version but still demands a player who generates their own pace and isn’t reliant on the frame to absorb heavy returns.
For the right player, particularly those who valued the previous Boom’s comfort and want incremental improvements in feel and connection, the 2026 is a worthwhile upgrade. For everyone else, demo the Pro before assuming the MP is your model. Both are now sharper tools than their predecessors, but neither is a wholesale reinvention.
I’ll update this review with my own court-side notes once I’ve put the MP and Pro through proper match-play testing.
This review is based on confirmed retailer listings, Head’s official technology documentation, and published playtest reviews from Tennis Warehouse, Tennisnerd, Sportega and Tennis Express. First-hand court testing notes will be added as those sessions are completed.
More Reviews From TGG
Acemate S10 Tennis Robot Review
I will admit something before we start. Before my first session with the Acemate S10,…
Wilson Defyer vs Blade
For a long time, the choice within Wilson’s range was simple for serious baseliners. You…
Defyer vs VCORE vs Aero
When I published my Wilson Defyer review, I promised a proper answer to the question…
Wilson Defyer Review
No racket in recent memory has been discussed as much before launch as this one,…
Head Extreme 2026 Review
Head has updated the Extreme for 2026, and on paper it looks like the most…
PUSUN PT-Max C Review
PUSUN has built a reputation for packing high-end ball machine features into prices that undercut…


